LANDFILL MINING FOR INTEGRATED RESOURCE RECOVERY: FIELD-SCALE WASTE CHARACTERIZATION WITH EMPHASIS ON ALUMINUM PERSISTENCE, CORROSION, AND RECOVERABILITY

  • Daniel Amponsah-Berko - Department of Chemical Engineering, Michigan Technological University, United States
  • Rebecca Kwofie - Department of Chemical Engineering, Michigan Technological University, United States
  • Kwabena Boafo - Department of Chemical Engineering, Michigan Technological University, United States
  • Vincent Arohunmolase - Department of Chemical Engineering, Michigan Technological University, United States
  • Palas Borkar - Department of Chemical Engineering, Michigan Technological University, United States
  • Kobina Akyea Ofori - Department of Chemical Engineering, Michigan Technological University, United States
  • Richard Oboh - Department of Chemical Engineering, Michigan Technological University, United States
  • Lucy Gibbs - Department of Social Sciences, Michigan Technological University, United States
  • Jonathan Robins - Department of Social Science, Michigan Technological University, United States
  • Timothy Eisele - Department of Chemical Engineering, Michigan Technological University, United States

Released under All rights reserved

Copyright: © 2026 CISA Publisher


Abstract

Aluminum is a critical industrial material with infinite recyclability, yet significant quantities are lost to municipal solid waste (MSW) landfills due to inefficient collection and sorting. This study evaluates landfill waste composition and examines aluminum persistence, corrosion behavior, and recoverability as part of an integrated resource recovery assessment through field-scale excavation and laboratory-scale simulations at the Marquette County Solid Waste Management Authority (MCSWMA) landfill. A total of 208 kg (dry weight) of excavated waste was sieved at 7 mm, yielding 67.4 wt.% fines and 32.58 wt.% coarse fraction. Manual sorting identified plastics (7.28 wt.%), wood (6.26 wt.%), and stones (11.03 wt.%) as major fractions alongside metals (2.34 wt.%), with aluminum at 0.43 wt.%. The combustible fraction (17.66 wt.%) presents potential for refuse-derived fuel production, while inert materials (~12.4 wt.%) are suitable for secondary aggregate reuse, together supporting a multi-stream recovery framework. Approximately 40% of recovered aluminum displayed surface corrosion, primarily affecting foils, while most beverage cans retained metallic integrity. Barrel-scale simulations and SEM-EDS analysis confirmed that uncoated foils are highly susceptible to corrosion through oxide formation and organic surface contamination, while coated cans largely persist in metallic form. All field data derive from a single sampling point and barrel experiments represent a simplified analog; conclusions are therefore site-indicative rather than site-wide. The findings demonstrate that while standalone aluminum recovery is economically insufficient at this concentration, integration within a multi-resource recovery framework — combining metals, combustibles, and inerts — presents a viable pathway toward circular economy objectives.

Keywords


Editorial History

  • Received: 26 May 2026
  • Revised: 07 Sep 2026
  • Accepted: 24 Sep 2026
  • Available online: 11 Nov 2026

References

Almoiqli, M., Alharbi, K. N., Alnuwaiser, M. A., Yajizi, G., Alshoshan, S., Baduways, W., Albeladi, M. I., Alsanea, R. S., & Aljohani, T. A. (2023). Corrosion behavior of Aluminium-Coated cans. Materials, 16(3), 1041

Amponsah-Berko, D., Kwofie, R., Eisele, T., & Robins, J. (2026). Mining Aluminum from Landfills: Challenges, Technologies, and the Case forPre-Landfill Intervention. Detritus, 34, 13-29

Association, T. A. (2023). Aluminum: The Element of Sustainability

Authority, M. C. S. W. M. (2024a). Annual report

AUTHORITY, M. C. S. W. M. (2024b). Annual report. M. C. S. W. M. Authority

Brems, A., Baeyens, J., & Dewil, R. (2012). Recycling and recovery of post-consumer plastic solid waste in a European context. Thermal Science, 16(3), 669-685

Calder, G. V., & Stark, T. D. (2010). Aluminum reactions and problems in municipal solid waste landfills. Practice Periodical of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste Management, 14(4), 258-265

Das, S. K., Green, J., & Kaufman, J. (2010). Aluminum recycling: Economic and environmental benefits. Light Metal Age, 68(1), 42

Dey, D. (2025). Aluminium for the Future: Recycling, Green Manufacturing, and Emerging Technologies

EPA, U. (2020). Advancing sustainable materials management: facts and figures report. Environmental Protection Agency

Hao, Z. (2020). Understanding and predicting temperatures in municipal solid waste landfills. North Carolina State University

Hasanbeigi, A., Springer, C., & Shi, D. (2022). Aluminum Climate Impact: An International Benchmarking of Energy and CO2 Intensities. Global Efficiency Intelligence. In

Janáková, I., Čech, M., Grabovská, Š., Šigut, O., Sala, P., & Kijo-Kleczkowska, A. (2024). Pyrolysis of Specific Non-Recyclable Waste Materials: Energy Recovery and Detailed Product Characteristics. Materials, 17(8), 1752

Jirang, C., & Roven, H. J. (2010). Recycling of automotive aluminum. Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China, 20(11), 2057-2063

Jones, P. T., Geysen, D., Tielemans, Y., Van Passel, S., Pontikes, Y., Blanpain, B., Quaghebeur, M., & Hoekstra, N. (2013). Enhanced Landfill Mining in view of multiple resource recovery: a critical review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 55, 45-55

Kaartinen, T., Sormunen, K., & Rintala, J. (2013). Case study on sampling, processing and characterization of landfilled municipal solid waste in the view of landfill mining. Journal of Cleaner Production, 55, 56-66

Krook, J., & Baas, L. (2013). Getting serious about mining the technosphere: a review of recent landfill mining and urban mining research. Journal of Cleaner Production, 55, 1-9

Krook, J., Svensson, N., & Eklund, M. (2012). Landfill mining: A critical review of two decades of research. Waste Management, 32(3), 513-520

Kuz’min, M. P., Kuz’mina, A. S., & Kuz’mina, M. Y. (2026). Recycling silicon waste into hypereutectic aluminum-silicon alloys. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 1-10

López, C. G., Küppers, B., Clausen, A., & Pretz, T. (2018). Landfill mining: a case study regarding sampling, processing and characterization of excavated waste from an Austrian landfill. Detritus, 2(June), 29-45

Lucas, M. S. H., Li, M. S. C., López, M. S. C. G., Hernández, M. S. J. C., Parrodi, M., Pretz, I. T., Wotruba, I. H., & Mercatorstraat, G. (2019). Primary evaluation of the use and refining of Al scrap recovered from a landfill in Belgium. EMC, Dusseldorf, Germany, 51-61

Masi, S., Caniani, D., Grieco, E., Lioi, D. S., & Mancini, I. M. (2014). Assessment of the possible reuse of MSW coming from landfill mining of old open dumpsites. Waste management, 34(3), 702-710

Monster, S. (2024). Aluminum Scrap Prices Paid by Scrap Yards in Michigan, United States

Padamata, S. K., Yasinskiy, A., & Polyakov, P. (2021). A review of secondary aluminum production and its byproducts. Jom, 73(9), 2603-2614

Padmanabhan, R., Oliveira, M., & Menezes, L. (2011). Lightweight metal alloy tailor welded blanks. In Tailor Welded Blanks for Advanced Manufacturing (pp. 97-117). Elsevier

Parrodi, J. C. H., Höllen, D., & Pomberger, R. (2018). Characterization of fine fractions from landfill mining: A review of previous investigations. Composites, 6(4), 46-62

Porter, R. C. (2004). Efficient targeting of waste policies in the product chain. the Economics of Waste, 117

Quaghebeur, M., Laenen, B., Geysen, D., Nielsen, P., Pontikes, Y., Van Gerven, T., & Spooren, J. (2013). Characterization of landfilled materials: screening of the enhanced landfill mining potential. Journal of Cleaner Production, 55, 72-83

Stark, T. D., Martin, J. W., Gerbasi, G. T., Thalhamer, T., & Gortner, R. E. (2012). Aluminum waste reaction indicators in a municipal solid waste landfill. Journal of geotechnical and geoenvironmental engineering, 138(3), 252-261

Telmo, C., Lousada, J., & Moreira, N. (2010). Proximate analysis, backwards stepwise regression between gross calorific value, ultimate and chemical analysis of wood. Bioresource technology, 101(11), 3808-3815

Tian, A., Tang, H., Chen, W., Pan, X., Wu, F., & Tang, Q. (2025). A Multi-Field Coupling Model for Municipal Solid Waste Degradation in Landfills: Integrating Microbial, Chemical, Thermal, and Hydraulic Processes. Sustainability, 17(21), 9691

van Gog, H. (2021). First-principles study of dehydration interfaces between diaspore and corundum, gibbsite and boehmite, and boehmite and γ-Al2O3: Energetic stability, interface charge effects, and dehydration defects. Applied Surface Science, 541, 148501

Wagland, S. T., Coulon, F., & Canopoli, L. (2019). Developing the case for enhanced landfill mining in the UK

Wagner, T. P., & Raymond, T. (2015). Landfill mining: Case study of a successful metals recovery project. Waste management, 45, 448-457

Zhang, S., Forssberg, E., Arvidson, B., & Moss, W. (1998). Aluminum recovery from electronic scrap by High-Force® eddy-current separators. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 23(4), 225-241