an official journal of: published by:
an official journal of: published by:
Editor in Chief: RAFFAELLO COSSU
Home

 

GO TO

IMPLEMENTATION STAGE FOR CIRCULAR ECONOMY IN THE DANISH BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION SECTOR

  • Lisbeth M. Ottosen - Department of Civil Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, Denmark
  • Lotte B. Jensen - Department of Civil Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, Denmark
  • Thomas Astrup - Department of Environmental Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, Denmark
  • Tim C. McAloone - Department of Mechanical Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, Denmark
  • Morten Ryberg - Department of Technology, Management and Economics, Technical University of Denmark, Denmark
  • Christian Thuesen - Department of Technology, Management and Economics, Technical University of Denmark, Denmark
  • Solbrit Christiansen - Department of Engineering Technology, Technical University of Denmark, Denmark
  • Anne J. Pedersen - Department of Chemical Technology, Technical University of Denmark, Denmark
  • Mads H. Odgaard - Office for Research, Advice and Innovation, Technical University of Denmark, Denmark

DOI 10.31025/2611-4135/2021.15110

Released under CC BY-NC-ND

Copyright: © 2021 CISA Publisher

Abstract

The building and construction sector is selected by the European Commission as a key product value chain in the transition towards circular economy (CE) due to the major resource consumption, waste generation and GHG emissions from this sector. This paper reports the result from qualitative and semi-structured interviews with 30 Danish stakeholders from the sector on the current stage of implementation of CE and the research/innovation needs to scale circular construction from niche to mainstream. The interviews showed a large variety in the stakeholder’s stage of transition from hardly knowing the term to having CE as a major driver in their business. Some meant that scaling of CE is close to impossible and that material reuse will never develop to more than a niche, whereas others already offer full-scale circular solutions to clients. The interviews pointed at a need for a common definition and terminology for CE, methods for documenting the gains from the circular solutions (economic and environmental), methods for technical documentation of the quality of reused materials, processes which enables scaling, methods to implement CE in various systems such as digitalization and building passports, new value chains and framework conditions in support of circularity. Regardless these needs, demonstration projects of major importance to gain general knowledge have been built or are planned in Denmark. These demonstrations have different approaches: using todays waste from different industries as construction materials; reusing construction materials (the basic building, elements or processed materials); and designing new buildings for disassembly to enable future reuse.

Keywords

Editorial History

  • Received: 02 Mar 2021
  • Revised: 07 Jun 2021
  • Accepted: 14 Jun 2021
  • Available online: 11 Sep 2021

References

Baldassarre, B., Schepers, M., Bocken, N., Cuppen, Korevaar, G., Calabretta, G. (2019) Industrial Symbiosis: towards a design process for eco-industrial clusters by integrating Circular Economy and Industrial Ecology perspectives, J. Clean. Prod. 216, 446–460

Benachio, G.L.F., Freitas, M.C.D., Tavares, S.F. (2020) Circular economy in the construction industry: A systematic literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production 260, 121046

Blomsma, F., Pieroni, M., Kravchenko, M., Pigosso, D.C.A., Hildenbrand, J., Kristinsdottir, A.R., Kristoffersen, E. Shahbazi, S., Nielsen, K.D., Jönbrink, A.-K., Li, J., Wiik, C., McAloone, T.C. (2019) Developing a circular strategies framework for manufacturing companies to support circular economy-oriented innovation. J. Clean. Prod. 241, 118271

European Commission (2015). Closing the Loop - an EU Action Plan for the Circular Economy. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. COM(2015) 614 final

European Commission (2020). Circular Economy Action Plan for a Cleaner and More Competitive Europe. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions

European Parliament and the Council (2008) Directive 2008/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 november 2008 on waste and repealing certain directives. Off. J. Eur. Communities, L312/3 (2008), pp. 3-30

Gorecki, J. (2019) Circular Economy Maturity in Construction Companies. Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering 471(11), 112090

Hertwich, E. G. (2021). Increased carbon footprint of materials production driven by rise in investments. Nature Geoscience, 1-5

Kirchherr, J.; Reike, D.; Hekkert, M. Conceptualizing the circular economy: An analysis of 114 definitions. Resources, Conservation & Recycling 127 (2017) 221–232

Brinkmann, S., & Kvale, S. (2018). Doing interviews (Second ed.). SAGE Publications Ltd

Lejrbo (2020) https://www.lejerbo.dk/om-lejerbo/byggeri/circle-house (In Danish, visited Sept. 2020))

Lendager (2013) https://lendager.com/en/architecture/upcycle-house-en/ (Visited Sept, 2020)

Lendager (2018) https://lendager.com/arkitektur/upcycle-studios/ (In Danish, visited Sept, 2020)

López Ruiz, L.A.L., Ramón, X.R., Domingo, S.G. (2020) The circular economy in the construction and demolition waste sector – A review and an integrative model approach. Journal of Cleaner Production 248, pp. 119238

Mhatre, P., Gedam, V., Unnikrishnan, S., Verma, S. (2021) Circular economy in built environment – Literature review and theory development. Journal of Building Engineering 35, 101995

Musicon (2020) https://musicon.dk/ (In Danish, visited Sept. 2020)

Næste Skur (2019) https://www.naeste.dk/ (In Dansih, visited February 2021)

OECD(2012) Sustainable materials management, making better use of resources

Prieto-Sandoval, V., Jaca, C., Ormazabal, M. (2018) Towards a consensus on the circular economy. Journal of Cleaner Production 179, 605-615

Ritzén, S., Sandström, G.Ö. (2017) Barriers to the Circular Economy – integration of perspectives and domains. Procedia CIRP 64, 7 – 12

United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division (2015). Population 2030: Demographic challenges and opportunities for sustainable development planning (ST/ESA/SER.A/389)

UNEP, 2019. 2019 global status report for buildings and construction: Towards a zero-emission, efficient and resilient buildings and construction sector. Global Alliance for Buildings and Construction, International Energy Agency and the United Nations Environment Programme

Worldometer (2021) https://www.worldometers.info/world-population/ (visited February 2021)

Related Contents