an official journal of: published by:
an official journal of: published by:
Editor in Chief: RAFFAELLO COSSU
Home

 

GO TO

Show volumes

EFFECT OF BOUNDARY CONDITIONS ON THE METHANE OXIDATION EFFICIENCY IN LANDFILL PILOT-SCALE BIOFILTERS

  • Jeovana Jisla das Neves Santos - Department of Civil and Building Engineering, University of Sherbrooke, Canada
  • Mauro Duarte de Oliveira Neto - Department of Civil and Building Engineering, University of Sherbrooke, Canada
  • Yohan Dulac - Department of Civil and Building Engineering, University of Sherbrooke, Canada
  • Jordan Carneiro Martins de Souza - Department of Civil and Building Engineering, University of Sherbrooke, Canada
  • Federico Galli - Department of Chemical and Biotechnological Engineering, University of Sherbrooke, Canada
  • Alexandre Cabral - Department of Civil and Building Engineering, University of Sherbrooke, Canada

DOI 10.31025/2611-4135/2026.19588

Released under CC BY-NC-ND

Copyright: © 2025 CISA Publisher

Abstract

This study compares the performance of two pilot-scale biofilters designed to mitigate methane emissions at the Complexe Environnemental de Saint-Michel (CESM) landfill in Montreal, Canada. Although both systems shared the same geometry, they differed in materials and boundary conditions. CESM1 used a compost-woodchip mixture, while CESM2 incorporated a compost-gravel blend (STEM) and was partially enclosed to enable continuous monitoring. Field measurements showed that CESM1 consistently achieved higher methane oxidation efficiency and greater temporal stability. In contrast, CESM2 exhibited performance variability, particularly during the summer 2024, when internal heating and surface cracking were observed under the shelter enclosure. These conditions may have affected gas distribution and methanotrophic activity. Batch tests confirmed reduced microbial oxidation capacity in CESM2, prompting corrective interventions such as surface tilling and zone-specific repairs. Despite lower efficiency, CESM2 oxidized a higher total mass of methane due to substantially greater loading rates. Both systems followed seasonal trends, suggesting ambient temperature as a contributing factor. The results underscore the importance of adapting biofilter design to site-specific boundary conditions, especially in enclosed configurations where thermal and moisture dynamics may deviate from open-field scenarios. While engineered media such as STEM can support methane oxidation, their performance is contingent on appropriate structural and environmental management. From a design perspective, ensuring adequate gas distribution, preventing excessive heat accumulation, and maintaining moisture balance are critical to sustaining methane oxidation performance. In enclosed systems, additional attention should be given to surface integrity to avoid preferential pathways and reduced performance.

Keywords

Editorial History

  • Received: 19 Dec 2025
  • Revised: 27 Mar 2026
  • Accepted: 08 Apr 2026
  • Available online: 27 Apr 2026

References

Abichou, T., Powelson, D., Chanton, J., Escoriaza, S., & Stern, J. (2006). Characterization of Methane Flux and Oxidation at a Solid Waste Landfill. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 132(2), 220–228.
DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(2006)132:2(220)

Ahoughalandari, B., Cabral, A. R., & Leroueil, S. (2018). Elements of design of passive methane oxidation biosystems: fundamental and practical considerations about compaction and hydraulic characteristics on biogas migration. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 36(4), 2593-2609.
DOI 10.1007/s10706-018-0485-z

Almeida, J. L., Dumouchel, J., Santos, J. J. N., Dulac, Y., Cabral, A. R., & Héroux, M. (2024). Construction, monitoring, and efficiency of a biofilter treating a high flow, lean, landfill gas. Waste Management, 190, 455–464.
DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2024.10.007

ASTM. (2019). D2216-19: Standard Test Methods for Laboratory Determination of Water (Moisture) Content of Soil and Rock by Mass (Nos D2216-19). https://www.astm.org/d2216-19.html

ASTM. (2021). D7263-21: Standard Test Methods for Laboratory Determination of Density and Unit Weight of Soil Specimens (No.D7263-21). https://www.astm.org/d7263-21.html

ASTM. (2023). D854-23: Standard Test Methods for Specific Gravity of Soil Solids by the Water Displacement Method (Nos D854-23). https://www.astm.org/d0854-23.html

ASTM D2974-14. (2020). Standard Test Methods for Moisture, Ash, and Organic Matter of Peat and Other Organic Soils (No. ASTM D2974-14). ASTM International.
DOI 10.1520/D2974-14

ASTM_International. (2013). ASTM D6539-13 Standard Test Method for Measurement of the Permeability of Unsaturated Porous Materials by Flowing Air.
DOI 10.1520/D6539

City of Montréal. (2020). Montréal Climate Plan: Objective carbon-neutral by 2050. Ville de Montréal. https://montreal.ca/en/articles/montreal-climate-plan-objective-carbon-neutral-2050-7613

Dever, S. A., Swarbrick, G. E., & Stuetz, R. M. (2011). Passive drainage and biofiltration of landfill gas: Results of Australian field trial. Waste Management, 31(5), 1029-1048.
DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2010.10.026

Duan, Z., Scheutz, C., & Kjeldsen, P. (2022). Mitigation of methane emissions from three Danish landfills using different biocover systems. Waste Management, 149, 156–167.
DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2022.05.022

Dulac, Y., & Cabral, A. (2025). Determination of the Water Occlusion Point of Structured Engineered Media Based on Air Permeability Testing [Paper submitted for publication]

Dulac, Y., Nelson, B. R., Zytner, R. G., & Cabral, A. R. (2024). Validation of a Methane Oxidation Biosystem Design Methodology Using Numerical Modeling. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 12, 1397134.
DOI 10.3389/fenvs.2024.1397134

ECCC. (2022). Climate Plan—Reducing methane emissions [Governement]. Environment and Climate Change Canada. https://www.canada.ca/en/services/environment/weather/climatechange/climate-plan/reducing-methane-emissions.html

Falk, J. M., Kjeldsen, P., Fredenslund, A. M., Buck, C., & Scheutz, C. (2025). Design and establishment of a biofilter for treatment of manure methane emissions. Waste Management, 206, 115087.
DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2025.115087

Farrokhzadeh, H., Hettiaratchi, J. P. A., Jayasinghe, P., & Kumar, S. (2017). Aerated biofilters with multiple-level air injection configurations to enhance biological treatment of methane emissions. Bioresource Technology, 239, 219–225.
DOI 10.1016/j.biortech.2017.05.009

Franzidis, J.-P., Héroux, M., Nastev, M., & Guy, C. (2008). Lateral migration and offsite surface emission of landfill gas at City of Montreal landfill site. Waste Management & Research, 26(2), 121–131.
DOI 10.1177/0734242X07085752

Gebert, J., Huber-Humer, M., & Cabral, A. R. (2022). Design of Microbial Methane Oxidation Systems for Landfills. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 10, 907562.
DOI 10.3389/fenvs.2022.907562

Gebert, J., Röwer, I.U., Scharff, H., Roncato, C.D.L., Cabral, A.R., 2011. Can Soil Gas Profiles Be Used to Assess Microbial CH4 Oxidation in Landfill Covers? Waste Management 31, 987–994.
DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2010.10.008

Gomez-Borraz, T. L., Torres-Arévalo, Y. V., Cuetero-Martínez, Y., González-Sánchez, A., & Noyola, A. (2025). Assessment of temperature dynamics during methane oxidation in a pilot scale compost biofilter. Bioresource Technology, 419, 132097.
DOI 10.1016/j.biortech.2025.132097

He, R., Ma, R.-C., Yao, X.-Z., & Wei, X.-M. (2017). Response of methanotrophic activity to extracellular polymeric substance production and its influencing factors. Waste Management, 69, 289–297.
DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2017.08.019

Huber-Humer, M., Gebert, J., & Hilger, H. (2008). Biotic Systems to Mitigate Landfill Methane Emissions. Waste Management & Research, 26(1), 33–46.
DOI 10.1177/0734242X07087977

ISO. (2017). 14688-2: Geotechnical investigation and testing—Identification and classification of soil (Nos 14688–2). https://www.iso.org/standard/66346.html

La, H., Hettiaratchi, J. P. A., Achari, G., Verbeke, T. J., & Dunfield, P. F. (2018). Biofiltration of methane using hybrid mixtures of biochar, lava rock and compost. Environmental Pollution, 241, 45–54.
DOI 10.1016/j.envpol.2018.05.039

Lagos, D. A., Héroux, M., Gosselin, R., & Cabral, A. R. (2017). Optimization of a landfill gas collection shutdown based on an adapted first-order decay model. Waste Management, 63, 238–245.
DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2016.08.012

QED Environmental Systems Inc., 2017. SEM 5000 Surface Emissions Monitor. URL https://www.qedenv.com/products/portable-methane-detector-sem5000/ (accessed 23.03.26)

Röwer, I. U., Geck, C., Gebert, J., & Pfeiffer, E. M. (2011). Spatial variability of soil gas concentration and methane oxidation capacity in landfill covers. Waste management, 31(5), 926-934.
DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2010.09.013

Scheutz, C., Duan, Z., Møller, J., & Kjeldsen, P. (2023). Environmental assessment of landfill gas mitigation using biocover and gas collection with energy utilisation at aging landfills. Waste Management, 165, 40-50.
DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2023.04.014

Souza, J. C. M., Neto, M. D. O., Dulac, Y., Santos, J. J. N., Galli, F., & Cabral, A. R. (2025). Continuous monitoring approach for estimating methane oxidation efficiency in biosystems. In Proceedings of Sardinia 2025 – 19th International Symposium on Waste Management and Sustainable Landfilling. CISA Publisher

Related Contents