CONSUMER BEHAVIOUR WITH REGARD TO WASTE SEPARATION IN PUBLIC AND PRIVATE SPACE
- Betül Gök - Institute for Water Quality and Resource Management, Technische Universität Wien (TU Wien), Austria
- Barbara Hartl - Department for Management and Economics, University for Continuing Education Krems, Austria
- Sabine Dworak - Institute for Water Quality and Resource Management, Technische Universität Wien (TU Wien), Austria
- Therese Schwarzböck - Institute for Water Quality and Resource Management, Technische Universität Wien (TU Wien), Austria
- Astrid Allesch - Institute of Waste Management and Circularity, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences (BOKU Vienna), Austria
- Available online in Detritus - In Press
- Pages
Released under CC BY-NC-ND
Copyright: © 2024 CISA Publisher
Abstract
Consumer behaviour plays an important part in waste separation. In contrast to private households, consumer behaviour in public spaces, like parks, pedestrian zones and on sidewalks, has hardly been analysed and waste separation in public is scarcely implemented. Recent research on the characterization of public waste indicates that waste from public spaces contains a high proportion of recyclables, which shows that considerations concerning the introduction of separate waste collection are reasonable. This study aims to understand the differences between consumer waste behaviour in private and public spaces. Waste separation behaviour in public spaces is analysed through guided interviews (n=12) and an online survey (n=238) of residents of Vienna (Austria) and is compared to waste separation behaviour in private spaces. The results show that, firstly, social norms regarding waste separation are more established in private households than in public spaces. Secondly, although the total amount of waste generated in public spaces is lower, recyclables (paper, plastic, metal, glass) are relevant waste fractions in public waste and are therefore regarded as important when high resource recovery is pursued. Thirdly, waste separation in public spaces requires more effort on the part of consumers disposing of waste than in private spaces. This is mainly due to the lack of recycling bins. Fourthly, waste separation in public spaces is seen as a lower priority by respondents compared to litter prevention. The results suggest that separation behaviour varies according to the contextual space and cannot be regarded as identical.Keywords
Editorial History
- Received: 02 Dec 2024
- Revised: 29 Jan 2025
- Accepted: 05 Feb 2025
- Available online: 02 Mar 2025
References
Ajzen, I., 1991. The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 50, 179–211.
DOI 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
Al-mosa, Y., Parkinson, J., Rundle-Thiele, S., 2017. A Socioecological Examination of Observing Littering Behavior. Journal of Nonprofit and Public Sector Marketing 29, 235–253.
DOI 10.1080/10495142.2017.1326354
Barr, S., Shaw, G., Coles, T., 2011. Sustainable lifestyles: Sites, practices, and policy. Environ Plan A 43, 3011–3029.
DOI 10.1068/a43529
Bator, R.J., Bryan, A.D., Wesley Schultz, P., 2011. Who Gives a Hoot?: Intercept Surveys of Litterers and Disposers. Environ Behav 43, 295–315.
DOI 10.1177/0013916509356884
Becker, N., 2014. Increasing High Recycling Rates. Sociodemographics as an additional layer of information to improve waste management. Lunds universitet Internationella miljöinstitutet (IIIEE).
DOI 10.13140/RG.2.2.29133.33769
Belk, R., 2017. Sharing without caring. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 10, 249–261.
DOI 10.1093/cjres/rsw045
Berengueres, J., Alsuwairi, F., Zaki, N., Ng, T., 2013. Gamification of recycle bin with emoticons. Tokyo, Japan, pp. 83–84.
DOI 10.1109/HRI.2013.6483512
Bernstad, A., 2014. Household food waste separation behavior and the importance of convenience. Waste Management 34, 1317–1323.
DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2014.03.013
Bilitewski, B., Härdtle, G., 2013. Abfallwirtschaft. Handbuch für Praxis und Lehre (Waste management. Handbook for practice and teaching), 4th ed. Springer Vieweg
BMK, 2022. Kreislaufwirtschaft: Ab 2023 österreichweit einheitliche Sammlung von Kunststoffverpackung (Circular economy: Standardised collection of plastic packaging throughout Austria from 2023) [WWW Document]. URL https://infothek.bmk.gv.at/verpackungsverordnung-ab-2023-oesterreichweit-einheitliche-sammlung-von-kunststoffverpackung/ (accessed 4.25.23)
BMK, 2017. Bundesabfallwirtschaftsplan 2017 – Teil 1 (Federal Waste Management Plan 2023 – Part 1). Vienna
Brothers, K.J., Krantz, P.J., Mcclannahan, L.E., 1994. Office paper recycling: A function of container proximity. J Appl Behav Anal 27, 153–160
Castaldi, G., Cecere, G., Zoli, M., 2021. “Smoke on the beach”: on the use of economic vs behavioral policies to reduce environmental pollution by cigarette littering. Economia Politica 38, 1025–1048.
DOI 10.1007/s40888-020-00205-5
Cialdini, R.B., 2003. Crafting Normative Messages to Protect the Environment. Current Directions in Psychological Science: A Journal of the American Psychological Society 12, 105–109.
DOI 10.1111/1467-8721.01242
Clarke, V., Braun, V., 2017. Thematic analysis. Journal of Positive Psychology.
DOI 10.1080/17439760.2016.1262613
Corten, R., 2019. Social dilemmas in the sharing economy. Edward Elgar Publishing
Dur, R., Vollaard, B., 2015. The Power of a Bad Example-A Field Experiment in Household Garbage Disposal. Environ Behav 47, 970–1000.
DOI 10.1177/0013916514535085
EC, 2018a. Directive (EU) 2018/852 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2018 amending Directive 94/62/EC on packaging and packaging waste
EC, 2018b. Directive (EU) 2018/851 of the European Parliament and of the council of 30 May 2018 amending Directive 2008/98/EC on waste (Text with EEA relevance)
EC, 2008. Directive 2008/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the council of 19 November 2008 on waste and repealing certain Directives
Field, A., 2009. Discovering Statistics Using SPSS. SAGE Publications
Flick, U., 2007. Qualitative Sozialforschung: Eine Einführung (Qualitative Social Research: An Introduction)., 10th ed. Rowohlt Taschenbuch, Hamburg
Gangl, K., Spitzer, F., Walter, A., Gottweis, R., Hübel, T., Keinprecht, M., 2022. Abfalltrennung und Littering im öffentlichen Raum. Ein verhaltensökonomisches Feldexperiment (Waste separation and littering in public spaces. A field experiment in behavioural economics)
GEM, 2023. Geschäftseinteilung Magistrat Wien - V001-260 (Vienna City Administration - V001-260)
Goffman, E., 1971. Relations in public. Microstudies of the public order. Routledge, New York
Goffman, E., 1963a. Behavior in Public Spaces: Notes on the social organization of gatherings. Free Press, New York
Goffman, E., 1963b. Stigma: Notes on Management of Spoiled Identity. Penguin, London
Hammond, C., 2005. The wider benefits of adult learning: An illustration of the advantages of multi-method research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology: Theory and Practice 8, 239–255.
DOI 10.1080/13645570500155037
Hartl, B., Hofmann, E., 2024. To sort or not to sort? – Consumers’ waste behavior in public.
DOI 10.47379/ESR20019
Jansson, J.O., 2011. Goods and service consumption in the affluent welfare state—issues for the future, in: Beyond the Consumption Bubble. Routledge, London, pp. 53–69
Jenkins, R.R., Martinez, S.A., Palmer, K., Podolsky, M.J., 2003. The determinants of household recycling: A material-specific analysis of recycling program features and unit pricing. J Environ Econ Manage 45, 294–318.
DOI 10.1016/S0095-0696(02)00054-2
Jesson, J.K., Pocock, R.L., Stone, I., 2014. Barriers to recycling: A review of evidence since 2008. Birmingham
Kaiser, F.G., Ranney, Michael., Hartig, T., Bowler, P.A., 1999. Ecological Behavior, Environmental Attitude, and Feelings of Responsibilty for the Environment. Eur Psychol 4
Keizer, K., Lindenberg, S., Steg, L., 2011. The reversal effect of prohibition signs. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations 14, 681–688.
DOI 10.1177/1368430211398505
Kemp, S., 1999. Utility of public goods, in: The Elgar Companion to Consumer Research and Economic Psychology. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp. 595–599
Kladnik, V., Dworak, S., Schwarzböck, T., 2024. Composition of public waste - a case study from Austria. Waste Management 178, 210–220.
DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2024.02.031
Knickmeyer, D., 2020. Social factors influencing household waste separation: A literature review on good practices to improve the recycling performance of urban areas. J Clean Prod.
DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118605
Kollock, P., 1998. Social dilemmas: The Anatomy of Cooperation, Annu. Rev. Sociol
Kormos, C., Gifford, R., 2014. The validity of self-report measures of proenvironmental behavior: Ameta-analytic review. J Environ Psychol.
DOI 10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.09.003
Kranert, M., 2017. Einführung in die Kreislaufwirtschaft. Planung – Recht – Verfahren (Introduction to the circular economy. Planning - Law - Procedure)., 5th ed, Einführung in die Kreislaufwirtschaft. Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden.
DOI 10.1007/978-3-8348-2257-4
Leeabai, N., Suzuki, S., Jiang, Q., Dilixiati, D., Takahashi, F., 2019. The effects of setting conditions of trash bins on waste collection performance and waste separation behaviors; distance from walking path, separated setting, and arrangements. Waste Management 94, 58–67.
DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2019.05.039
Liu, J.H., Sibley, C.G., 2004. Attitudes and behavior in social space: Public good interventions based on shared representations and environmental influences. J Environ Psychol 24, 373–384.
DOI 10.1016/j.jenvp.2003.12.003
MA23, 2023. Statistisches Jahresbuch der Stadt Wien 2023. Wien in Zahlen (Statistical Yearbook of the City of Vienna 2023. Vienna in figures). Vienna
MA23, 2022. Wien in Zahlen 2022 (Vienna in Numbers 2022). Vienna
MA48, 2023a. Jahresbericht 2022 (annual report 2022)
MA48, 2023b. Nicht gefährlicher Abfall – Abfallmengen Wien. Straßenkehricht (Non-hazardous waste - waste volumes Vienna. Street sweepings) [WWW Document]. URL https://www.wien.gv.at/umweltschutz/abfall/nicht-gefaehrliche-abfallmenge.html#strassenkehricht (accessed 1.3.23)
MA48, 2017. Strategische Umweltprüfung zum Wiener Abfallwirtschaftsplan (Wr. AWP) 2019-2024 und zum Wiener Abfallvermeidungsprogramm (Wr. AVP) 2019-2024. Anhang I – Ist-Zustand der Wiener Abfallwirtschaft 2017 (Langfassung). Strategic environmental assessment of the Vienna Waste Management Plan (Wiener Abfallwirtschaftsplan, Wr. AWP) 2019-2024 and the Vienna Waste Prevention Programme (Wr. AVP) 2019-2024. Annex I - Current state of Vienna’s waste management 2017 (long version). Vienna
Mayring, P., 2002. Einführung in die qualitative Sozialforschung: Eine Anleitung zu qualitativem Denken (Introduction to qualitative social research: A guide to qualitative thinking), 6th ed
McCoy, K., Oliver, J.J., Borden, D.S., Cohn, S.I., 2018. Nudging waste diversion at Western State Colorado University: application of behavioral insights. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education 19, 608–621.
DOI 10.1108/IJSHE-05-2017-0063
Miafodzyeva, S., Brandt, N., 2013. Recycling behaviour among householders: Synthesizing determinants via a meta-analysis. Waste Biomass Valorization 4, 221–235.
DOI 10.1007/s12649-012-9144-4
Miao, L., Wei, W., 2013. Consumers’ pro-environmental behavior and the underlying motivations: A comparison between household and hotel settings. Int J Hosp Manag 32, 102–112.
DOI 10.1016/j.ijhm.2012.04.008
Milfont, T.L., 2009. The effects of social desirability on self-reported environmental attitudes and ecological behaviour. Environmentalist 29, 263–269.
DOI 10.1007/s10669-008-9192-2
Nguyen, T.T.P., Zhu, D., Le, N.P., 2015. Factors influencing waste separation intention of residential households in a developing country: Evidence from Hanoi, Vietnam. Habitat Int 48, 169–176.
DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2015.03.013
Oskamp, S., Zelezny, L., Schultz, P.W., Hurin, S., Burkhardt, R., 1996. Commingled versus separated curbside recycling. Does sorting matter? Environ Behav 28, 73–91.
DOI 10.1177/0013916596281004
Ostrom, E., Ahn, T.K., 2007. The meaning of social capital and its link to collective action. Edgar Elgar, Northhampton
Park, J., Ha, S., 2014. Understanding Consumer Recycling Behavior: Combining the Theory of Planned Behavior and the Norm Activation Model. Fam Consum Sci Res J 42, 278–291.
DOI 10.1111/fcsr.12061
Przyborski, A., Wohlrab-Sahr, M., 2021. Qualitative Sozialforschung (Qualitative social research). De Gruyter.
DOI 10.1515/9783110710663
Rousta, K., Bolton, K., Lundin, M., Dahlén, L., 2015. Quantitative assessment of distance to collection point and improved sorting information on source separation of household waste. Waste Management 40, 22–30.
DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2015.03.005
Schultz, P.W., Bator, R.J., Large, L.B., Bruni, C.M., Tabanico, J.J., 2013. Littering in Context. Environ Behav 45, 35–59.
DOI 10.1177/0013916511412179
Secondi, L., Principato, L., Laureti, T., 2015. Household food waste behaviour in EU-27 countries: A multilevel analysis. Food Policy 56, 25–40.
DOI 10.1016/j.foodpol.2015.07.007
Sorkun, M.F., 2018. How do social norms influence recycling behavior in a collectivistic society? A case study from Turkey. Waste Management 80, 359–370.
DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2018.09.026
StatistikAustria, 2023. Bevölkerung zu Jahresbeginn nach Bundesland, Alter, Geschlecht sowie österreichischer/ausländischer Staatsangehörigkeit seit 2002 (Population at the beginning of the year by federal state, age, gender and Austrian/foreign nationality since 2002)
StatistikAustria, 2017. Umweltbedingungen, Umweltverhalten 2015 (environmental conditions, environmental behaviour 2015)
Sussman, R., Greeno, M., Gifford, R., Scannell, L., 2013. The Effectiveness of Models and Prompts on Waste Diversion: A Field Experiment on Composting by Cafeteria Patrons. J Appl Soc Psychol 43, 24–34.
DOI 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2012.00978.x
Timlett, R.E., Williams, I.D., 2009. The impact of transient populations on recycling behaviour in a densely populated urban environment. Resour Conserv Recycl 53, 498–506.
DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2009.03.010
Timlett, R.E., Williams, I.D., 2008. Public participation and recycling performance in England: A comparison of tools for behaviour change. Resour Conserv Recycl 52, 622–634.
DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2007.08.003
Van Lange, P.A.M., Joireman, J., Parks, C.D., Van Dijk, E., 2013. The psychology of social dilemmas: A review. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 120, 125–141.
DOI 10.1016/j.obhdp.2012.11.003
Xu, L., Ling, M., Lu, Y., Shen, M., 2017. Understanding household waste separation behaviour: Testing the roles of moral, past experience, and perceived policy effectiveness within the theory of planned behaviour. Sustainability (Switzerland) 9.
DOI 10.3390/su9040625
Zhang, D., Huang, G., Yin, X., Gong, Q., 2015. Residents’ waste separation behaviors at the source: Using SEM with the theory of planned behavior in Guangzhou, China. Int J Environ Res Public Health 12, 9475–9491.
DOI 10.3390/ijerph120809475
Zhou, C., Fang, X. juan, Wang, Y. jie, Zhang, Q., 2022. The influence mechanism of household waste separation behavior among college students in the post COVID-19 pandemic period. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 24, 784–800.
DOI 10.1007/s10163-022-01363-3