an official journal of: published by:
an official journal of: published by:
Editor in Chief: RAFFAELLO COSSU


  • Ian Williams - University of Southampton, Faculty of Engineering and Physical Sciences, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
  • Lorna Powell - University of Southampton Faculty of Engineering and Physical Sciences, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

Released under CC BY-NC-ND

Copyright: © 2018 CISA Publisher


‘Fast fashion’ and a ‘take, make, dispose’ economy are fueling people’s accumulation of goods, and their willingness to throw these goods away. The end of each University year sees tens of thousands of students clear out their homes, and lives, and move on to pastures new, leaving behind a wake of unwanted clothing, kitchenware and bedding, amongst other ‘throwaway’ items. Sustainable waste management schemes at higher education institutions (HEIs) are becoming more prominent, and are taking the opportunity to generate positive outcomes from this problem that affects most university cities across the country. This study comprises of an extensive review of HEI reuse schemes as well as the collection of primary data during the planning and running of “Shift Your Stuff”, an end-of-term reuse scheme run by Southampton University Students Union (SUSU). The study develops an existing protocol, designed to provide a consistent method of running and analysing an end of term re-use scheme, and refining it to create a methodology which could be easily transferred to other universities. We critically analyse the methods, protocol and key performance indicators (KPIs) which have been used in previous years, and report on the success of this year’s project, in comparison to previous years. The KPIs continued to be an effective way of displaying the success of the scheme, with a 92.4% reuse rate – an improvement on the previous year, along with a host of social benefits including the donation of food and clothing to the homeless or deprived and the contribution to ground-breaking heart disease research undertaken by the British Heart Foundation (BHF). These benefits were brought about by the donations themselves, and by the £3,474 raised through the sale of donations. Although the total amount of donations was lower in comparison to previous years, the quality was substantially higher, with a lower percentage of donations having to be sent for disposal. We make a series of suggestions on how to improve the scheme in order make it more effective. For universities to reach their potential in terms of donations, it is recommended that the running of the scheme is handed over to a charitable organisation that is set up for this purpose.


Editorial History

  • Received: 19 Jul 2018
  • Revised: 21 Nov 2018
  • Accepted: 17 Jan 2019
  • Available online: 23 Apr 2019


Alexander, C. and Smaje, C. (2008). Evaluating third sector reuse organisations in the UK: Case-studies and analysis of furniture reuse schemes. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 52, 719-730

British Heart Foundation (BHF) (2016a). About Us [Online]. Available: [Accessed 20/08/17]

BHF (2016b). Pack For Good [Online]. Available: [Accessed 28/02/17 2017]

Bianchi, C. and Birtwistle, G. (2010). Sell, give away, or donate: an exploratory study of fashion clothing disposal behaviour in two countries. The International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research, 20, 353-368

Birtwistle, G. and Moore, C. M. (2007). Fashion clothing–where does it all end up? International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 35, 210-216

Love Where You Live Bristol (2017). Bristol Big Give [Online]. Available: [Accessed 02/03/17 2017]

Bruce, M. and Daly, L. (2006). Buyer behaviour for fast fashion. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An International Journal, 10, 329-344

Cachon, G. P. and Swinney, R. (2011). The Value of Fast Fashion: Quick Response, Enhanced Design, and Strategic Consumer Behavior. Management Science, 57, 778-795

Castellani, V., Sala, S. and Mirabella, N. (2015). Beyond the Throwaway Society: A Life Cycle-Based Assessment of the Environmental Benefit of Reuse. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management, 11 (3), 373-382

Del Borghi, A., Gallo, M. & Del Borghi, M. (2009). A survey of life cycle approaches in waste management. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 14, 597-610

Dogs Trust (2017). About Us [Online]. Available: [Accessed 20/08/17]

Diop, S-A., & Shaw, P. (2018). End of use textiles: gifting and giving in relation to societal and situational factors. Detritus, 1, 155-161

Fortuna, L.M. and Diyamandoglu, V., (2016). A novel method for material characterisation of reusable products. Waste Management, 52, 14-24

Gosling, C. (2016). Students hit back after being blamed for turning Plymouth streets into ‘rubbish dump’. Plymouth Herald

Higher Education Funding Ccouncil for Englan (HEFCE) (2017). National Student Survey 2017- results [Online]. Available: [Accessed 10/08/17]

Hislop, H. (2011). Reinventing the wheel: a circular economy for resource security, Green Alliance

Horne, S. (2000). The charity shop: purpose and change. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 5, 113-124

ICAEW (2017). Environmental Key Performance Indicators [Online]. Available: [Accessed 21/03/2017 2017]

Jamie’s Computers (2016). About Us [Online]. Available: [Accessed 20/08/17]

Joung, H. M. and Park-Poaps, H. (2013). Factors motivating and influencing clothing disposal behaviours. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 37, 105-111

Joy, A., Sherry, J. F., JR., Venkatesh, A., Wang, J. and Chan, R. (2012). Fast Fashion, Sustainability, and the Ethical Appeal of Luxury Brands. Fashion Theory-the Journal of Dress Body & Culture, 16, 273-295

Keep Britian Tidy, 2013. The Big Litter Inquiry: The public’s voice on litter. Keep Britain Tidy

Kozinets, R. V. and Handelman, J. M. (2004). Adversaries of consumption: Consumer movements, activism, and ideology. Journal of Consumer Research, 31, 691-704

Morgan, L. R. and Birtwistle, G. (2009). An investigation of young fashion consumers’ disposal habits. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 33, 190-198

Patel, C. (2016). Using third dector reuse to reduce waste and create a sustainable legacy. University of Southampton, Unpublished data

Bristol Post. (2016). Calls for action as Bristol student’s rubbish left to fester. Bristol Post

Refugee Action (2017). About Us [Online]. Available: [Accessed 20/08/17]

Resta B. and Dotti S. (2015). Environmental impact assessment methods for textiles and clothing. Handbook of Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of Textiles and Clothing, pp. 149-191

Two Saints (2016). Southampton, Eastleigh & The New Forest [Online]. Available: [Accessed 20/08/17]

St Francis. (2017). About Us [Online]. Available: [Accessed 20/08/17]

Sull, D. and Turnoconi, S. (2008). Fast fashion lessons fast fashion industry. Business Strategy Review, 19, 5-11

Students and Staff of the Centre for Environmental Science (2017). Editorial: Millennials to the rescue? Waste Management, 62, 1-2

Warwick Univeristy,. 2015. Charity 2015 [Online]. Available: [Accessed 28/02/17 2017]

Waddington, S. (2016). Students blamed for leaving Plymouth streets in ‘disgusting’ mess. Plymouth Herald

Williams, I.D. and Taylor, C. (2004). Maximising household waste recycling at civic amenity sites in Lancashire, England. Waste Management, 24(9), 861-874

Williams, I.D. and Cole, C. (2013). The impact of alternate weekly collections on waste arisings. Science of the Total Environment, 445-446, 29-40

Williams, I.D. and Shaw, P.J. (2017). Editorial: Reuse: Fashion or future? Waste Management, 59, 1-3

Williams, I.D. and Shaw, P.J. (2018). Key Principles for Reuse. Proceedings of SUM 2018, 4th Symposium on Urban Mining and Circular Economy, 21-23 May, Bergamo, Italy

Waste and Resources Action Programme (WRAP) (2016). KPIs [Online]. Available: [Accessed 20/03/2017 2017]

Zhang, N.; Williams, I.D.; Kemp, S. and Smith, N.F. (2011). Greening Academia: Developing sustainable waste management at higher education institutions. Waste Management, 31(7), 1606-1616