an official journal of: published by:
an official journal of: published by:
Editor in Chief: RAFFAELLO COSSU


  • Nathali Meza - Geoscience & Engineering Department, Delft University of Technology, Netherlands
  • Hans Lammen - AFVALZORG, Netherlands
  • Carmen Cruz - AFVALZORG, Netherlands
  • Timo Heimovaara - Geoscience & Engineering Department, Delft University of Technology, Netherlands
  • Julia Gebert - Geoscience & Engineering Department, Delft University of Technology, Netherlands

Released under CC BY-NC-ND

Copyright: © 2022 CISA Publisher


In-situ aeration of landfills accelerates biodegradation of waste organic matter and hence advances waste stabilization. The spatial outreach of aeration greatly affects stabilization efficiency. This study analyzed the spatial variability of gas composition and flow in 230 wells spread over four compartments of a Dutch landfill which is under in situ aeration since 2017, as well as the carbon extraction efficiency, temperature, and settlement. Flow rates and gas composition in the extraction wells varied strongly. The highest variability was observed in the compartment with the highest water tables with submerged filter screens for most wells, with low flow rates, and elevated ratios of CH4 to CO2, indicating predominance of anaerobic processes (compartment 11Z). The compartment with the most uniform distribution of gas flow rates, composition and lower ratios of CH4 to CO2, suggesting a significant share of aerobic carbon mineralization, also showed higher temperatures, a carbon extraction efficiency, and larger cumulative settlement, all indicative of enhanced microbial activity (compartment 11N). In this compartment, the amount of extracted carbon exceeded the carbon generation predicted from landfill gas modeling by the factor of 2 over the hitherto four years aeration. The effect of water tables on gas flow and the correlation between the flow, and the ratio of CH4 to CO2 appeared weak, indicating that also other factors than water tables influence gas concentration and flow. Future work includes stable isotope probing to analyze the significance of microbial respiration and microbial CH4 oxidation for the composition of the final extracted gas mixture.


Editorial History

  • Received: 18 Jan 2022
  • Revised: 25 Mar 2022
  • Accepted: 12 May 2022
  • Available online: 30 Jun 2022


Cabral, A. R., Capanema, M. A., Gebert, J., Moreira, J. F., & Jugnia, L. B. (2010). Quantifying microbial methane oxidation efficiencies in two experimental landfill biocovers using stable isotopes. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 209(1–4), 157–172.
DOI 10.1007/s11270-009-0188-4

Chanton, J. P., Powelson, D. K., Abichou, T., & Hater, G. (2008). Improved field methods to quantify methane oxidation in landfill cover materials using stable carbon isotopes. Environmental Science and Technology, 42(3), 665–670.
DOI 10.1021/es0710757

Cruz, C., Lammen, H., & Oonk, H. (2021). Sustainable landfill management: carbon removal in two aerated landfills

Erses, A. S., Onay, T. T., & Yenigun, O. (2008). Comparison of aerobic and anaerobic degradation of municipal solid waste in bioreactor landfills. Bioresource Technology, 99(13), 5418–5426.
DOI 10.1016/j.biortech.2007.11.008

Fellner, J., & Brunner, P. H. (2010). Modeling of leachate generation from MSW landfills by a 2-dimensional 2-domain approach. Waste Management (New York, N.Y.), 30(11), 2084–2095.
DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2010.03.020

Gebert, J., Jong, T. De, Rees-white, T., Beaven, R., & Lammen, H. (2021). Spatial Variability of Leachate Tables , Leachate Composition and Hydraulic Conductivity in a Landfill Stabilized By in Situ Aeration

Gebert, J., & Streese-Kleeberg, J. (2017). Coupling Stable Isotope Analysis with Gas Push-Pull Tests to Derive In Situ Values for the Fractionation Factor α ox Associated with the Microbial Oxidation of Methane in Soils . Soil Science Society of America Journal, 81(5), 1107–1114.
DOI 10.2136/sssaj2016.11.0387

Giani, L., Bredenkamp, J., & Eden, I. (2002). Temporal and spatial variability of the CH4 dynamics of landfill cover soils. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science, 165(2), 205–210.
DOI 10.1002/1522-2624(200204)165:2<205::AID-JPLN205>3.0.CO;2-T

Grossule, V., & Stegmann, R. (2020). Problems in traditional landfilling and proposals for solutions based on sustainability. Detritus, 12, 78–91.
DOI 10.31025/2611-4135/2020.14000

Hrad, M., Gamperling, O., & Huber-Humer, M. (2013). Comparison between lab- and full-scale applications of in situ aeration of an old landfill and assessment of long-term emission development after completion. Waste Management, 33(10), 2061–2073.
DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2013.01.027

Hrad, M., & Huber-Humer, M. (2017). Performance and completion assessment of an in-situ aerated municipal solid waste landfill – Final scientific documentation of an Austrian case study. Waste Management, 63, 397–409.
DOI 10.1016/J.WASMAN.2016.07.043

Lammen, H., Cruz, C., & Scharff, H. (2021). Sustainable landfill management : leachate development in two aerated landfills

Lammen, H., Van Zomeren, A., Dijkstra, J. J., & Comans, R. N. J. (2019). Sustainable landfill management: solid waste sampling and geochemical characterization prior to (an)aerobic stabilization of three old landfills. Proceedings Sardinia 2019, Seventeenth International Waste Management and Landfill Symposium, 11 pp.-11 pp

Mønster, J., Kjeldsen, P., & Scheutz, C. (2019). Methodologies for measuring fugitive methane emissions from landfills – A review. Waste Management, 87, 835–859.
DOI 10.1016/J.WASMAN.2018.12.047

Rachor, I. M., Gebert, J., Gröngröft, A., & Pfeiffer, E. M. (2013). Variability of methane emissions from an old landfill over different time-scales. European Journal of Soil Science, 64(1), 16–26.
DOI 10.1111/ejss.12004

Ritzkowski, M., Heyer, K.-U., & Stegmann, R. (2006). Fundamental processes and implications during in situ aeration of old landfills. Waste Management (New York, N.Y.), 26(4), 356–372.
DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2005.11.009

Ritzkowski, M., & Stegmann, R. (2012). Landfill aeration worldwide: Concepts, indications and findings. Waste Management, 32(7), 1411–1419.
DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.02.020

Röwer, I. U., Geck, C., Gebert, J., & Pfeiffer, E. M. (2011). Spatial variability of soil gas concentration and methane oxidation capacity in landfill covers. Waste Management, 31(5), 926–934.
DOI 10.1016/J.WASMAN.2010.09.013

Scharff, H., & Jacobs, J. (2006). Applying guidance for methane emission estimation for landfills. Waste Management (New York, N.Y.), 26(4), 417–429.
DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2005.11.015

Spokas, K., Graff, C., Morcet, M., & Aran, C. (2003). Implications of the spatial variability of landfill emission rates on geospatial analyses. Waste Management, 23(7), 599–607.
DOI 10.1016/S0956-053X(03)00102-8

Sustainable Landfill Foundation. (n.d.). Introducing Sustainable Landfill programme (iDS). Retrieved February 24, 2021, from

van Turnhout, A. G., Oonk, H., Scharff, H., & Heimovaara, T. J. (2020). Optimizing landfill aeration strategy with a 3-D multiphase model. Waste Management, 102, 499–509.
DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2019.10.051

Vereniging Afvalbedrijven. (2015). Project plan Sustainable Landfill Management Braambergen (Issue November)

Xu, X. B., Powrie, W., Zhang, W. J., Holmes, D. S., Xu, H., & Beaven, R. (2020). Experimental study of the intrinsic permeability of municipal solid waste. Waste Management, 102, 304–311.
DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2019.10.039

Yazdani, R., Mostafid, M. E., Han, B., Imhoff, P. T., Chiu, P., Augenstein, D., Kayhanian, M., & Tchobanoglous, G. (2010). Quantifying factors limiting aerobic degradation during aerobic bioreactor landfilling. Environmental Science and Technology, 44(16), 6215–6220.
DOI 10.1021/es1022398