an official journal of: published by:
Editor in Chief: RAFFAELLO COSSU


  • Kristyna Rybova - Department of Demography and Geodemography, Charles University, Czech Republic
  • Boris Burcin - Department of Demography and Geodemography, Charles University, Czech Republic
  • Jan Slavik - Faculty of Social and Economic Studies, Jan Evangelista Purkyně University in Ústí nad Labem, Czech Republic

DOI 10.26403/detritus/2018.2

Released under CC BY-NC-ND

Copyright: © Cisa Publisher

Editorial History

  • Received: 03 Jan 2018
  • Revised: 07 Mar 2018
  • Accepted: 19 Mar 2018
  • Available online: 31 Mar 2018


Municipal solid waste generation has been analyzed in broad range of studies but most of the studies neglect the spatial aspect of analyzed datasets. This paper’s aim is to explore spatial dependency in relations between municipal solid waste generation and socio-demographic aspects. The results obtained using geographically weighted regression are compared with results of widely used ordinary least square regression. Even though both methods found the same significant socio-demographic aspects, we were able to explain much higher share of intermunicipal variability using the geographically weighted regression because this method is able to consider changing strength and even direction of relation in different spatial units. Geographically weighted regression can therefore better mirror the local situation and could be successfully utilized to plan waste management activities at local scale.



Aphale O., Thyberg K.L. and Tonjes D.J. (2015). Differences in waste generation, waste composition, and source separation across three waste districts in a New York suburb. Resour Conserv Recy., vol. 99, 19–28

Arbulú I., Lozano J and Rey-Maquieira J. (2015). Tourism and solid waste generation in Europe: A panel data assessment of the Environmental Kuznets Curve. Waste Manage., vol. 46, 628-636.

Bach H., et al. (2004). Combining socio-demographic and logistic factors to explain the generation and collection of waste paper. Resour Conserv Recy., vol. 41, no. 1, 65-73.

Barr S (2007). Factors influencing environmental attitudes and behaviors: a U.K. case study of household waste management. Environ Behav., vol. 39, no. 4, 435-473.

Beigl P., et al. (2004). Forecasting municipal solid waste generation in major European cities. In: IEMSs 2004 International Congress: Complexity and Integrated Resources Management, Osnabrück, Germany. 2004.

Beigl P., Lebersorger S. and Salhofer S. (2008). Modelling municipal solid waste generation: A review. Waste Manage., vol. 28, no. 1, 200-214.

Czech Statistical Office. 2013. Databáze výsledků sčítání lidu, domů a bytů 2011: průřezové: sčítání lidu, domů a bytů 2011 k 26.3.2011 (English: Database of Results of Population and Housing Census 2011: cross-sectional: Population and Housing Census 2011 on the 26th March 2011). Praha. ISBN 978-80-250-2357-0.

Gellynck X., et al. (2011). Identifying the key factors in increasing recycling and reducing residual household waste: A case study of the Flemish region of Belgium. J Environ Manage., vol. 92, no. 10, 2683-2690.

Hage O. and Söderholm P. (2008). An econometric analysis of regional differences in household waste collection: the case of plastic packaging waste in Sweden. Waste Manage., vol. 28, no. 10, 1720-1731.

Ismaila A.B., et al. (2015). Modelling Municipal Solid Waste Generation Using Geographically Weighted Regression: A Case Study of Nigeria. Int Res J Environ Sci., vol. 4, no. 8, 98-108.

Keser S., Duzgun S. and Aksoy A. (2012). Application of spatial and non-spatial data analysis in determination of the factors that impact municipal solid waste generation rates in Turkey. Waste Manage., vol. 32, no. 3, 359-371.

Khan D., Kumar A. and Samadder S.R. (2016). Impact of socioeconomic status on municipal solid waste generation rate. Waste Manage., vol. 49, 15-25.

Kipperberg, G. (2007). A comparison of household recycling behaviors in Norway and the United States. Environ Resour Econ., vol. 36, no. 2, 215-235.

Lazarevic D., Buclet N. and Brandt N. (2012). The application of life cycle thinking in the context of European waste policy. J Clean Prod., vol. 29-30, 199-207.

Lebersorger S and Beigl P (2011). Municipal solid waste generation in municipalities: Quantifying impacts of household structure, commercial waste and domestic fuel. Waste Manage., vol. 31, n. 9-10, 1907-1915.

Musil J. and Müller J. (2008). Vnitřní periferie v České republice jako mechanismus sociální exkluze. Sociologický časopis, vol. 44, no. 2, 321-348.

Rybová K. and Slavík J. (2016). Can Demographic Characteristics Explain Intermunicipal Differences in Production of Municipal Waste? In: Špalková, D.; Matějová, L. (eds.) Proceedings of the 20th International Conference Current Trends in Public Sector Research 2016. Brno: Masaryk University, 375-382.

Schultz P., Oskamp S. and Mainieri T. (1995). Who recycles and when? A review of personal and situational factors. J Environ Psychol., vol. 15, no. 2, 105-121.

Sjöström M. and Östblom G. (2010). Decoupling waste generation from economic growth – A CGE analysis of the Swedish case. Ecol Econ., vol. 69, 1545 - 1552

SMOCR (Union of Towns and Municipalities of the Czech Republic). (2011). Aktualizace strategie rozvoje nakládání s odpady v obcích a městech ČR. Praha: Svaz měst a obcí České republiky. Available on http:

Starr J. and Nicolson C. (2015). Patterns in trash: Factors driving municipal recycling in Massachusetts. Resour Conserv Recy., vol. 99, 7 - 18

Sterner T. and Bartelings H. (1999). Household waste management in a Swedish municipality: determinants of waste disposal, recycling and composting. Environ Resour Econ., vol. 13, no. 4, 473-491.

Talalaj I.A. and Walery M. (2015). The effect of gender and age structure on municipal waste generation in Poland. Waste Manag., vol. 40, 3-8.

Wheeler D. C. and Páez A. (2010). Geographically Weighted Regression. Handbook of Applied Spatial Analysis. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.